KOA's Newman echoed misleading assertion that Obama said he would "brutally attack [] ally country" Pakistan "with bombing raids"
Summary: On his February 28 broadcast, Newsradio 850 KOA's "Gunny" Bob Newman misrepresented a remark by Sen. Barack Obama to assert that Obama had suggested he would "openly and brutally attack" Pakistan "with bombing raids." Newman's distortion of the Democratic presidential candidate's statement in an August 2007 speech parroted that of other conservative commentators; in fact, Obama had said, "If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and [Pakistani] President [Pervez] Musharraf won't act, we will."
Echoing a line of false and misleading conservative commentary, "Gunny" Bob Newman asserted on his February 28 Newsradio 850 KOA broadcast that Sen. Barack Obama (IL) "would like to bomb Pakistan," adding that Obama had made the "suggestion to openly and brutally attack an ally country with bombing raids."
In fact, as Media Matters for America has noted repeatedly, during an August 1, 2007, foreign policy speech, Obama stated: "If we have actionable intelligence about high-value terrorist targets and [Pakistani] President [Pervez] Musharraf won't act, we will." Obama made any actions conditional, not definite, and did not specify what actions he would take. Moreover, Newman failed to note that several media outlets, including The Washington Post, have reported that the United States recently used a CIA Predator aircraft to launch missile strikes at terrorist targets inside Pakistan and that "the U.S. spy agency did not seek approval" from the Pakistani government.
From the February 28 broadcast of Newsradio 850 KOA's The Gunny Bob Show:
NEWMAN: Barack Obama has brought up how he would like to bomb Pakistan. Why can't Barack Obama grasp that when you are considering military action, you must weigh all the hoped-for positive results against the possible negative results? In his stunning arrogance, Obama feels his judgment is vastly superior to that of the military and intelligence communities -- which, by the way, were mortified at his suggestion to openly and brutally attack an ally country with bombing raids. This from a man who couldn't tell a B-1 from a Piper Cub! It was amazing to hear him call for a bombing campaign on villages where children live among the terrorists without so much as batting an eye regarding civilian casualties!
—E.B. & J.F.B.
to listen to this audio clip


Comments (5) Show
1 - 5 |
Well, I don't know this Newman guy, but I can be fairly certain his reading and comprehension skills rival those of first year immigrants, in second grade, who can't speak or read English. And, seriously, 'weigh in all the hoped for positive results against possible negative results'? I bet he was beating his chest in opposition to the commanding-is-neat's decision to invade a country that had nothing to do with the turrists.
And another thing- all these *media* outlets that are spreading this lie keep using the term 'bomb' instead of any other word, like invade, fight against, deal with harshly, attack, etc. I wonder why? My guess is that all the other words have been used by the republicants in defense of killing innocents in Iraq, and they need to use a brand new word for Obama, just so there's some distance between them.
"you must weigh all the hoped-for positive results against the possible negative results?"
You mean like before invading Iraq, or as Senator bomb-bomb-bomb...bomb-bomb-Iran McCain put it?
Another Newman "wet dream" for the ages. What a moron.
Of all of the red liars for hire, herr streicher should be the most disgusting but dangerous sycophant to follow via CMM. The gutteral, hate based nationalist socialist propaganda the stolen valor fraud puts out is straight out of the nazi playbook. "Just make the lies huge, the people will eat 'em up". Add in the fact that the next President of the United States is African American and this self avowed racist herr streicher will be over the top early and often.
1 - 20 |